热敏灸治疗三叉神经痛不同灸位的临床疗效观察
Clinical Observation on Trigeminal Neuralgia in Different Moxibustion Positions Treated by Thermal Moxibustion
-
摘要: 目的 比较热敏灸治疗原发性三叉神经痛(PTN)不同灸位的临床疗效差异。方法 将62例PTN患者随机分为热敏腧穴悬灸试验组(以下简称试验组)32例和非热敏腧穴悬灸对照组(以下简称对照组)30例。试验组采用热敏腧穴温和悬灸治疗,以热敏灸感消失为度,对照组采用非热敏腧穴温和悬灸治疗,每次40 min,2组每日2次,共治疗5 d,第6天开始每日1次,连续治疗25次,共治疗35次(共30 d),观察治疗前后2组患者治疗疗效、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、头痛生活质量问卷(MSQ)量表计分等变化。结果 与治疗前相比,2组VAS计分、MSQ(即功能受限、功能障碍、情感3部分)评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05~0.01);与对照组相比,治疗组VAS计分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),且MSQ(即功能受限、功能障碍、情感三部分)评分有明显差异(P<0.05~0.01);治疗组总有效率为78.13%,与对照组(53.33%)相比,P<0.05。结论 热敏腧穴悬灸治疗PTN疗效优于非热敏腧穴悬灸,热敏腧穴准确定位能提高灸疗疗效。Abstract: OBJECTIVE To compare the therapeutic effects of Thermal Moxibustion in the treatment of primary trigeminal neuralgia in different moxibustion positions. METHODS 62 cases of primary trigeminal neuralgia were randomly divided into a treatment group (32 cases) treated with mild and suspended moxibustion on thermal acupoint, and a control group (30 cases) treated with mild and suspended moxibustion on non-thermal acupoints. 30 days made up the course of treatment (40min each time, and two times per day in the first 5 days and 1 time per day in the following 25 days). The changes of therapeutic effects, visual analogue scale (VAS), and Migraine specific quality of life questionnaire (MSQ) of the two groups were contrasted and evaluated after the treatment. RESULTS Compared with pre-treatment, the treatment group had a remarkable difference (P<0.05~0.01) in VAS, MSQ score. In contrast to the control group, there was statistically significant difference in VAS score in treatment group(P<0.05), with more significant difference in MSQ score(functional limitations, dysfunction, emotion)(P<0.05~0.01). The total effective rate of the treatment group was 78.13%, better than 53.33% of the control group(P<0.05). CONCLUSION Suspended moxibustion on thermal acupoint, which is superior to suspended moxibustion on non-thermal acupoint in the treatment of primary trigeminal neuralgia, can improve the therapeutic effects of moxibustion.