基于一测多评法对不同产地桂枝药材中苯丙素类成分的分析

Analysis of Phenylpropanoid Compounds in Cinnamomi Ramulus from Different Origins Based on Quantitative Analysis of Multi‑Components by Single‑Marker Method

  • 摘要:
    目的 建立一测多评法(Quantitative analysis of multi‑components by single marker, QAMS)同时测定桂枝中香豆素、肉桂醇、肉桂酸、桂皮醛及邻甲氧基肉桂醛5种苯丙素类成分的含量,并结合多元统计分析对不同产地(广东肇庆、广西梧州、广西玉林)桂枝进行综合评价。
    方法 采用Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18(100 mm×2.1 mm,1.7 μm)色谱柱,以0.1%甲酸水(A)-乙腈(B)为流动相,梯度洗脱;流速0.4 mL·min-1;紫外检测波长254 nm,柱温25 ℃,进样量1 μL。以肉桂酸为内参物,分别建立香豆素、肉桂醇、桂皮醛及邻甲氧基肉桂醛的相对校正因子,实现多成分同步定量。进一步采用偏最小二乘判别分析(Partial least squares discriminant analysis, PLS‑DA)对数据进行处理,并通过变量重要性投影值(Variable importance in projection, VIP)作图筛选差异成分。
    结果 QAMS与外标法(External standard method, ESM)所测得桂枝药材中苯丙素类成分(除肉桂醇外)含量间无显著差异;以肉桂酸为内参物,香豆素、桂皮醛及邻甲氧基肉桂醛的相对校正因子分别为5.920、4.434、8.087,且在不同实验条件下重现性良好(RSD<5.0%)。其中,肉桂酸为不同产地桂枝药材的主要差异成分。
    结论 本研究建立的QAMS方法联合多元统计分析可用于不同产地桂枝药材的质量评价。

     

    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE To establish a quantitative analysis of multi‑components by single‑marker (QAMS) method for the simultaneous determination of five phenylpropanoid components (coumarin, cinnamyl alcohol, cinnamic acid, cinnamaldehyde, and o⁃methoxycinnamaldehyde) in Cinnamomi Ramulus, and to comprehensively evaluate the quality of samples from different origins (Zhaoqing, Guangdong; Wuzhou, Guangxi; Yulin, Guangxi) using multivariate statistical analysis.
    METHODS Separation was performed on a Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm) using a mobile phase consisting of 0.1% formic acid in water (A) and acetonitrile (B) with gradient elution. The flow rate was 0.4 mL·min⁻¹, the UV detection wavelength was set at 254 nm, the column temperature was maintained at 25 ℃, and the injection volume was 1 μL. Using cinnamic acid as the internal reference substance, relative correction factors for coumarin, cinnamyl alcohol, cinnamaldehyde, and o‑methoxycinnamaldehyde were established to achieve simultaneous quantification. Partial least squares‑discriminant analysis (PLS‑DA) was employed for data processing, and variable importance in projection (VIP) values were used to identify differential components.
    RESULTS The content of phenylpropanoid components (except cinnamyl alcohol) determined by the QAMS method showed no significant difference compared with those obtained by the external standard method. The relative correction factors for coumarin, cinnamaldehyde, and o‑methoxycinnamaldehyde relative to cinnamic acid were 5.920, 4.434, and 8.087, respectively, with good reproducibility (RSD<5.0%) under different experimental conditions. Cinnamic acid was identified as the major differential component among samples from different origins.
    CONCLUSION The established QAMS method combined with multivariate statistical analysis can be effectively used for quality evaluation of Cinnamomi Ramulus from different growing regions.

     

/

返回文章
返回