理筋正骨手法重建膝骨关节炎患者股四头肌-髌韧带生物力学稳态及功能: 一项随机对照试验

Tissue-Bone Homeostasis Manipulation Restores Quadriceps-Patellar Ligament Biomechanical Homeostasis and Functional Performance in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

  • 摘要:
    目的 观察理筋正骨手法对膝骨关节炎(Knee osteoarthritis,KOA)患者髌周生物力学指标及膝关节功能的干预效应。
    方法 选取2024年10月至2025年5月安徽中医药大学针灸康复科就诊的Kellgren-Lawrence分级为Ⅱ~Ⅲ期的KOA患者60例,随机分为理筋正骨手法组与经皮神经肌肉电刺激组各30例。采用双因素重复测量方差分析,比较2组干预前和干预6周后生物力学指标及功能学指标变化。主要生物力学指标包括股直肌张力、股内侧肌张力、股外侧肌张力、髌韧带张力、髌骨向外被动活动度(Lateral patellar displacement,LPD)和髌骨向内被动活动度(Medial patellar displacement,MPD)、髌骨标准化活动度LPD/髌宽(Patellar width,PW)和MPD/PW以及膝关节屈曲活动度。功能学指标包括KOOS量表评分、计时起立-行走测试(Time up and go,TUGT)。
    结果 干预后,理筋正骨手法组各项生物力学及膝关节功能指标均显著改善(P < 0.05,P < 0.01),对照组仅股内侧肌张力、TUGT及KOOS pain、ADL、QoL评分明显改善(P < 0.01)。理筋正骨手法组生物力学指标中的股直肌张力、股外侧肌张力、髌韧带张力、MPD/PW、LPD/PW及膝关节屈曲活动度改善幅度优于对照组(P < 0.05,P < 0.01);功能学评估中, 理筋正骨手法组在KOOS量表各维度及TUGT的交互效应均具统计学意义(P < 0.05,P < 0.01)。事后简单效应分析证实上述指标在干预后组间差异显著(P < 0.05),且所有指标均呈现显著时间主效应(P < 0.01),提示干预措施具有持续且累积的疗效。
    结论 理筋正骨手法通过重塑软组织张力与髌骨活动的动态平衡,可有效改善KOA患者的关节功能及生活质量, 最终实现“筋骨并治”的治疗目标。

     

    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE To investigate the intervention effects of tissue-bone homeostasis manipulation (TBHM) on peripatellar biomechanical parameters and knee joint function in knee osteoarthritis (KOA) patients.
    METHODS Sixty patients with KOA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade Ⅱ-Ⅲ) were recruited from the Acupuncture-Moxibustion Rehabilitation Department, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine between October 2024 and May 2025. Participants were randomized into a TBHM group (n=30) or a transcutaneous electrical neuromuscular stimulation (TENS) group (n=30). Using two-way repeated measures ANOVA, biomechanical indicators, including rectus femoris tension, vastus medialis tension, vastus lateralis tension, patellar ligament tension, lateral patellar displacement (LPD), medial patellar displacement (MPD), normalized patellar mobility (LPD/patellar width PW, MPD/PW), knee flexion range of motion, and functional indicators, including KOOS subscales, time up and go test (TUGT), were compared between groups at baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention.
    RESULTS After intervention, all biomechanical and knee joint function indicators in the TBHM group were significantly improved (P < 0.05, P < 0.01), while only the vastus medialis tension, TUGT and KOOS Pain, ADL and QoL scores in the control group were significantly improved (P < 0.01). The improvement amplitudes of biomechanical indicators in the TBHM group, including rectus femoris tension, vastus lateralis tension, patellar ligament tension, MPD/PW, LPD/PW and knee flexion range of motion were better than those in the control group (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). In the functional evaluation, the interaction effects of the TBHM group in all dimensions of the KOOS score and TUGT were statistically significant(P < 0.05, P < 0.01). Post-hoc simple effect analysis confirmed that there were significant differences in the above indicators between the two groups after intervention (P < 0.05), and all indicators showed a significant main effect of time (P < 0.01), suggesting that the intervention measures had continuous and cumulative curative effects.
    CONCLUSION TBHM effectively improves joint function and quality of life in KOA patients by restoring dynamic equilibrium in soft tissue tension and patellar mobility, ultimately achieving the therapeutic goal of concurrent tissue-bone management.

     

/

返回文章
返回