国内外典型蜂胶样本关键质控指标及抗氧化活性研究

Study on Key Quality Control Indicators and Antioxidant Activity of Typical Propolis Samples from domestic and Abroad

  • 摘要:
    目的 对来自于6个国外和5个国内不同地区典型蜂胶样本乙醇提取物、总酚、总黄酮含量和HPLC指纹图谱进行分析,优化提取工艺并进行抗氧化活性评价,为完善蜂胶质量控制体系提供数据支持。
    方法 以黄酮含量为指标优化蜂胶提取工艺,对比三氯化铝法、硝酸铝法、聚酰胺粉法三种黄酮检测方法,并检测各样本乙醇提取物含量、总酚含量和DPPH自由基清除能力,进一步分析了HPLC指纹特征图谱。
    结果 80%乙醇为提取溶剂、50 ℃、搅拌时间3 h、超声功率180 W、超声时间15 min所得蜂胶提取物中黄酮含量最高,三氯化铝法为蜂胶总黄酮的最佳测定方法。新疆蜂胶原料样本乙醇提取物、总黄酮和总酚含量低,但其80%乙醇提取物抗氧化活性较优。HPLC图谱分析,巴西红蜂胶中不含白杨素、高良姜素、咖啡酸苯乙酯,巴西绿蜂胶不含阿魏酸、芹菜素、对香豆酸、白杨素和乔松素;其他样品9种化合物含量各有不同,但提取物抗氧化能力却与化合物含量不完全一致。
    结论 蜂胶的化学成分复杂,各品种间差异大,其关键质控指标需综合考虑理化特征和生物活性,建立物质基础-生物活性联动的评估体系,以利于实现优质优价,促进行业健康发展。

     

    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE To analyze the ethanol extracts, total phenols, total flavonoids contents and HPLC fingerprints of typical propolis samples from 6 foreign countries and 5 domestic regions, optimize the extraction process and evaluate the antioxidant activity, so as to provide data support for improving the quality control system of propolis.
    METHODS The optimization of the propolis extraction process utilized flavonoid content as an indicator. Three flavonoid detection methods-namely, the aluminum trichloride method, aluminum nitrate method, and polyamide method-were compared. The content of ethanol extract, total phenol content, and the scavenging ability of DPPH free radicals for each sample were determined. Further analysis was conducted using HPLC fingerprint profiling.
    RESULTS The propolis extract with the highest flavonoid content was obtained using 80% ethanol as the extraction solvent, operating at 50 ℃, with a stirring time of 3 h, ultrasonic power of 180 W, and ultrasonic time of 15 min. The aluminum trichloride method was proved to be the most effective for determining total flavonoids in propolis. While the ethanol extract, total flavonoids, and total phenols of propolis from Xinjiang, China were relatively low, their antioxidant activity exhibited superiority. HPLC analysis revealed, Brazilian red propolis lacked of chrysin, galangin, caffeic acid phenethyl ester and Brazilian green propolis lacked ferulic acid, apigenin, p-coumaric acid, chrysin, and pinocembrin. In contrast, the content of these four compounds in other samples varied, with the antioxidant capacity of the extracts not precisely corresponding to the compound content.
    CONCLUSION Propolis exhibits a complex chemical composition with significant variations among varieties. Key quality control indexes must be comprehensively considered, encompassing physicochemical characteristics and biological activity. Establishing a multi-angle assessment system with a material basis-functional linkage is essential. This approach facilitates the realization of high quality and cost-effectiveness, thereby promoting the healthy development of the industry.

     

/

返回文章
返回