ATC分类编码和中成药分类编码比较分析
Comparative Study on Classification and Coding of ATC and Chinese Traditional Patent Medicine
-
摘要: 目的 通过比较世界卫生组织(WHO)药物的Anatomical-Therapeutic-Chemical (ATC)分类编码与中成药分类编码的异同,为中成药分类编码的标准化、信息化、国际化提供建议和参考。方法 采用描述性分析方法,比较ATC分类编码和《中药分类与代码》、中国药房医药经济信息网(CPPN)及日本汉方等几种中成药分类编码在分类层次、分类依据等编码方法方面的差异,以及对中成药分类编码的启示与影响。结果 中成药传统的病证分类法、功效分类法及综合分类法在逐步借鉴ATC的分类模式,采用逻辑性更严密的编码和分类,部分实现了与ATC的接轨。结论 中成药的分类应在保持中医药特色的基础上借鉴ATC分类编码方法,逐步探索出与国际接轨的中成药分类编码。Abstract: OBJECTIVE To compare the classification and coding between Anatomical-Therapeutic-Chemical (ATC) and Chinese traditional patent medicine to provide some advice and reference for the standardization, information and internationalization of TCPM. METHODS ATC classification and coding was compared with those of Classification and Coding of Chinese Materia Medica, China Pharmacy Pharmainfo Net (CPPN) and Japanese Kampo medicine through descriptive analysis method in classification levels, classification basis and coding approaches to attain some experience and effect for classification and coding of Chinese patent medication. RESULTS The classification methods of Chinese traditional patent medicine according to diseases and syndromes, effect and comprehensive condition are drawing lessons from ATC model, more strict logic, partially achieved the connection with ATC. CONCLUSION Classification of Chinese traditional patent medicine can take example from that of ATC and gradually gets in line with international classification and coding.