Effects of Tangshenan Formula on Micro-Urinary Albumin, Microinflammation and Insulin Resistance in Patients with Early Diabetic Nephropathy
-
摘要: 目的 观察糖肾安方对早期糖尿病肾病(DN)患者尿微量白蛋白(micro-UALB)、微炎症状态、胰岛素抵抗(IR)的影响。方法 86例早期DN气阴两虚兼血瘀证的患者, 按照随机数字表法分为对照组与观察组各43例。对照组进行常规治疗, 观察组在对照组的治疗基础上加服糖肾安方。12周后比较2组患者治疗前后的中医证候积分、尿蛋白指标[尿微量白蛋白(micro-UALB)、尿白蛋白/尿肌酐(UACR)]、血清炎症因子[白细胞介素6(IL-6)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)]、胰岛素抵抗指标[空腹胰岛素(FIN)、稳态模型评估IR指数(HOMA-IR)、空腹血糖(FBG)]及肾功能指标[血清肌酐(SCr)、血尿素(BUN)]的变化。结果 治疗后, 观察组中医证候积分、尿蛋白指标、炎症指标、IR指数均明显下降, 差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05, P < 0.01),观察组优于对照组(P < 0.05, P < 0.01)。结论 糖肾安方可有效改善早期DN患者症状、减少尿蛋白、抑制炎症因子及改善胰岛素抵抗。Abstract: OBJECTIVE To observe the effects of Tangshenan formula on micro-urinary albumin (micro-UALB), microinflammatory status and insulin resistance (IR) in patients with early diabetic nephropathy (DN).METHODS A total of 86 patients with early stage DN, identified as deficiency of both qi and yin combined with blood stasis syndrome, were divided into 43 patients in the control group and 43 patients in the observation group according to the random number table. The control group was treated conventionally, while the observation group was treated with Tangshenan formula on the basis of the treatment of the control group. After 12 weeks of treatment, we compared the changes in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome score, urine protein indexes [urine micro-UALB, urine albumin/urinary albumin creatinine (UACR)], serum microinflammatory factors [interleukin 6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α)], insulin resistance indexes [fasting insulin (FIN), homeostasis model assessment IR index (HOMA-IR)], fasting blood glucose (FBG), as well as renal function indexes [serum creatinine (SCr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN)].RESULTS After treatment, the TCM syndrome score, urine protein index, inflammation index and IR index in the observation group reduced significantly, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05, P < 0.01); the results in the treatment group were better than those in the control group (P < 0.05, P < 0.01).CONCLUSION Tangshenan formula can effectively relieve the symptoms, reduce proteinuria, inhibit inflammatory factors and enhance insulin resistance in early DN patients.
-
表 1 2组患者治疗前后中医证候积分比较(x±s, n=43)
组别 时间 总积分 尿浊 乏力 气短 咽干口燥 对照组 治疗前 20.81±5.18 2.02±1.06 2.86±0.68 2.47±0.85 2.42±0.70 治疗后 19.16±3.15 1.44±0.73* 2.58±0.63* 2.53±0.80 2.35±0.65 观察组 治疗前 20.58±4.68 2.33±0.84 2.77±0.61 2.37±0.79 2.33±0.68 治疗后 14.93±4.02**## 1.16±0.76* 2.37±0.66** 2.21±0.86 1.67±0.84**## 组别 时间 头晕 多梦 尿频尿多 手足心热 心悸 对照组 治疗前 2.23±0.92 2.35±0.81 2.33±0.94 2.63±0.82 1.51±0.83 治疗后 2.16±0.84 2.07±0.77 2.12±0.88 2.40±0.79* 1.51±0.77 观察组 治疗前 2.16±0.87 2.19±0.80 2.40±0.79 2.58±0.82 1.49±0.82 治疗后 1.81±0.88 1.4±0.82**## 1.72±0.70**# 1.74±0.85**## 1.17±0.83**## 注: 组内比较, *P < 0.05,**P < 0.01;组间比较, #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01。 表 2 2组患者治疗前后尿蛋白指标比较(x±s, n=43)
组别 时间 micro-UALB/(mg·L-1) UACR/(mg·mmol-1) 对照组 治疗前 190.36±28.48 16.66±4.94 治疗后 181.26±27.34 16.48±4.22 观察组 治疗前 193.13±29.96 16.65±5.69 治疗后 134.76±31.67**## 10.09±3.59**## 注: 组内比较, **P < 0.01;组间比较, ##P < 0.01。 表 3 2组患者治疗前后IR相关指标比较(x±s, n=43)
组别 时间 FBG/(mmol·L-1) FIN/(μU·mL-1) HOMA-IR 对照组 治疗前 6.69±0.73 15.92±7.16 57.32±13.57 治疗后 6.74±0.77 14.94±6.22 54.63±12.39 观察组 治疗前 6.75±0.82 15.18±5.84 57.53±12.72 治疗后 6.96±0.75 10.75±4.35**## 40.9±12.77**## 注: 组内比较, **P < 0.01;组间比较, ##P < 0.01。 表 4 2组患者治疗前后炎症因子水平比较(x±s, n=43)
组别 时间 CRP/(mg·L-1) IL-6/(pg·mL-1) TNF-α/(pg·mL-1) 对照组 治疗前 7.13±1.94 6.64±2.01 4.26±1.10 治疗后 7.17±1.56 6.49±2.14 4.18±1.20 观察组 治疗前 7.36±1.47 6.88±2.17 4.21±1.05 治疗后 2.28±1.06**## 2.62±1.08**## 1.89±0.73**## 注: 组内比较, **P < 0.01;组间比较, ##P < 0.01。 表 5 2组患者治疗前后肾功能比较(x±s, n=43)
组别 时间 BUN/(mmol·L-1) Scr/(μmol·L-1) 对照组 治疗前 5.39±0.90 67.36±7.49 治疗后 5.36±0.79 66.62±9.53 观察组 治疗前 5.66±0.62 67.12±8.13 治疗后 5.52±0.63 66.56±8.30 -
[1] American Diabetes Association. 11. Microvascular complications and foot care: Standards of medical care in diabetes 2020[J]. Diabetes Care, 2020, 43(S1): S135-S151. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30559237 [2] 中华医学会肾脏病学分会专家组. 糖尿病肾脏疾病临床诊疗中国指南[J]. 中华肾脏病杂志, 2021, 37(3): 257-260. http://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7104329975 [3] 中华医学会糖尿病学分会. 中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2020年版)[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2021, 13(4): 315-409. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZXJ202106003.htm [4] 代晓颖, 张燕, 易静, 等. 中医药降低早期糖尿病肾病患者蛋白尿水平疗效的Meta分析[J]. 北京中医药大学学报, 2016, 39(2): 144-150. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2157.2016.02.012 [5] 张晶露, 邱琳, 雒晓春. 糖尿病肾病发病机制研究进展[J]. 医学综述, 2017, 23(8): 1623-1627. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2084.2017.08.036 [6] 李意春, 郝二伟, 刘婧曦, 等. 中国和东盟国家常用传统药物治疗糖尿病及其并发症药理作用的研究进展[J]. 中草药, 2021, 52(4): 1165-1176. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZCYO202104031.htm [7] 孙超, 谢晴宇, 孟庆刚. 糖尿病肾病中医证素分布规律研究[J]. 北京中医药大学学报, 2015, 38(4): 266-270. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2157.2015.04.010 [8] ANDRASSY KM. Comments on KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease[J]. Kidney Int, 2013, 84(3): 622-623. http://www.scienceopen.com/review?vid=359fd281-f6a8-4c40-b1d8-40b0e7568d8e [9] 高彦彬, 刘铜华, 李平. 糖尿病肾病中医防治指南[J]. 中国中医药现代远程教育, 2011, 9(4): 151-153. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2779.2011.04.112 [10] 中药新药临床研究指导原则[M]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2002: 233-237. [11] LAL MA, PATRAKKA J. Understanding podocyte biology to develop novel kidney therapeutics[J]. Front Endocrinol, 2018, 23(9): 409. http://www.onacademic.com/detail/journal_1000040527956910_d40d.html [12] KARALLIEDDE J, GNUDI L. Diabetes mellitus, a complex and heterogeneous disease, and the role of insulin resistance as a determinant of diabetic kidney disease[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2016, 31(2): 206-213. http://ndt.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/12/30/ndt.gfu405.full.pdf [13] SEMENKOVICH CF. Insulin resistance and a long, strange trip[J]. N Engl J Med, 2016, 374(14): 1378-1379. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1600962 [14] 张体华, 王明. 糖尿病肾病患者炎症水平、免疫功能及与肾脏病变的关系[J]. 中国免疫学杂志, 2016, 32(10): 1524-1526, 1531. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-484X.2016.10.024 [15] 程子安, 王国兴, 张欣欣. 糖尿病肾病蛋白尿与CRP、肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮水平的关系[J]. 中华全科医学, 2015, 13(10): 1641-1642, 1680. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYQY201510030.htm [16] NAVARRO-GONZALEZ JF, MORA-FERNÁNDEZ C. The role of inflammatory cytokines in diabetic nephropathy[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2008, 19(3): 433-442. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007091048 [17] 丁彦, 常红云. 糖尿病肾病患者血清hs-CRP、IL-6、MCP-1及AngptI4水平变化特点及临床意义[J]. 四川医学, 2019, 40(11): 1150-1154. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SCYX201911017.htm [18] 魏伊秋, 李满, 余佳. 慢性炎症与胰岛素抵抗机制关系的研究进展[J]. 临床与病理杂志, 2019, 39(3): 640-645. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WYSB201903030.htm [19] REHMAN K, AKASH MS. Mechanisms of inflammatory responses and development of insulin resistance: How are they interlinked?[J]. J Biomed Sci, 2016, 23(1): 87. doi: 10.1186/s12929-016-0303-y [20] 魏靖, 朱慧楠. 糖尿病肾病患者血清胰岛素抵抗指数、胰岛素样生长因子-1与炎性因子表达水平的相关性[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2019, 39(3): 546-547. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2019.03.013 [21] 王宇阳, 路晓光, 刘童童, 等. 益气养阴活血法治疗糖尿病肾病的理论基础[J]. 辽宁中医杂志, 2020, 47(3): 101-103. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LNZY202003031.htm [22] ZHOU J, XU G, MA S, et al. Catalpol ameliorates high-fat diet-induced insulin resistance and adipose tissue inflammation by suppressing the JNK and NF-κB pathways[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2015, 467(4): 853-858. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.10.054 [23] 张语迟, 李赛男, 刘春明, 等. 人参叶提取物的提取工艺及抗氧化活性评价研究[J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2017, 35(2): 326-329. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYHS201702019.htm [24] 李翎熙, 陈迪路, 周小江. 玄参化学成分、药理活性研究进展及其质量标志物分析预测[J]. 中成药, 2020, 42(9): 2417-2426. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1528.2020.09.032 [25] 刘印, 陈兆杰. 知母多糖治疗糖尿病大鼠[J]. 中成药, 2017, 39(9): 1761-1765. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1528.2017.09.001 [26] 李巧月, 李莲慧, 李大山, 等. 接骨木属植物化学成分和药理作用的研究进展[J]. 中国药房, 2021, 32(9): 1118-1130. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGYA202109016.htm [27] 张振芳, 赵宏伟, 柴煊, 等. 白花蛇舌草对葡聚糖硫酸钠诱导的慢性溃疡性结肠炎小鼠的影响[J]. 中草药, 2015, 46(23): 3520-3525. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZCYO201523015.htm [28] 莫超, 史伟, 王夏青, 等. 中药水蛭对肾病血瘀证的研究及应用[J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2018, 36(1): 130-132. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYHS201801034.htm
计量
- 文章访问数: 146
- HTML全文浏览量: 34
- PDF下载量: 91
- 被引次数: 0