含黄芩苷注射剂中突发性热原污染的去除研究
Research on Removing Sudden Pyrogen Contamination in Baicalin Injection
-
摘要: 目的 优选含黄芩苷的注射剂中突发性污染的热原去除工艺。方法 采用动态浊度法和HPLC法检测不同浓度活性炭及不同截留分子量的超滤膜使用前后黄芩苷药液中细菌内毒素及有效成分含量,分别计算细菌内毒素去除率和黄芩苷回收率。结果 在热原突发污染情况下,测得0.10%,0.50%,1.00% 3种浓度活性炭对黄芩苷药液的细菌内毒素去除率分别为80.2%,91.7%和95.6%,同时黄芩苷回收率分别为90.8%,73.1%和51.3%;黄芩苷药液经5和10 kDa相对截留分子量的超滤膜的细菌内毒素去除效率均接近100%,黄芩苷回收率分别为52.6%和94.3%。结论 该实验明确了各种浓度活性炭都不能有效去除黄芩苷类药液的热原且对黄芩苷吸附率很高,而超滤法对黄芩苷药液热原的去除效果较好且成分回收率也很高,为中药注射剂生产工艺中去除热原提供依据。Abstract: OBJECTIVE To optimize the pyrogen removing process of sudden contamination in injections containing baicalin. METHODS The bacterial endotoxin (BE) and effective composition contents in baicalin solution were detected by kinetic turbidity method and HPLC before and after using different concentrations of activated carbon and different molecular weight cut off (MWCO) ultrafiltration membranes to calculate the removal rate of BE and baicalin recovery rate, respectively. RESULTS Under the condition of pyrogen sudden pollution, BE removal rate in baicalin solution were 80.2%, 91.7% and 95.6% when using 0.10%, 0.50% and 1.00% activated carbon, and recovery rate of baicalin were 90.8%, 73.1% and 51.3%. BE removal rate in baicalin solution were nearly 100% when using 5 and 10 kDa MWCO ultrafiltration membrane, the recovery rate of baicalin were 52.6%, 94.3%. CONCLUSION The experiments confirmed that different concentrations of activated carbon cannot effectively remove the pyrogen of baicalin solution, and the adsorption rate of baicalin was high; while ultrafiltration showed better results in pyrogen removal with high recovery rate, thus providing the basis for the production of Chinese medical injections.
-
Key words:
- baicalin /
- bacterial endotoxin /
- activated carbon /
- ultrafiltration
-
[1] Nagaki M, Hughes RD, Lau JY, et al. Removal of endotoxin and cytokines by adsorbents and the effect of plasma protein binding[J]. Int J Artif Organs, 1991, 14(1): 43-50. [2] Olenchock SA, Lenhart SW, Mull JC. Occupational exposure to airborne endotoxins during poultry processing[J]. J Toxicol Environ Health, 1982, 9(2): 339-349. [3] 肖贵南,程朝辉,盛英美.活性炭吸附细菌内毒素的作用研究[J].中国药房,2010, 21(5):443-445. [4] Xiao GN, Cheng CH, Sheng YM. Absorptive effect of activated Carbon on endotoxin[J].Chin Pharm, 2010, 21(5): 443-445. [5] 李存玉,郑云枫,李红阳,等.细菌内毒素定量法研究活性炭与超滤法热原去除工艺[J].医药导报,2010, 29(2):142-144. [6] Li CY, Zheng YF, Li HY, et al. Pyrogens removing technique with activeated Carbon and ultrafiltration by quantitative detection of bacterial endotoxins[J]. Herald Med, 2010, 29(2): 142-144. [7] 杨国秀,张同星,彭国平.清热解毒类清开灵注射液中热原检测方法的比较[J].中药与临床,2011, 02(2):27-29. [8] Yang GX, Zhang TX, Peng GP. The comparison of pyrogen test method for Qingkailing injection with heat-clearing and detoxifying effect[J]. Pharm Clin Chin Mater Med, 2011, 02 (2): 27-29. [9] Chung CP, Park JB, Bae KH. Pharmacological effects of methanolic extract from the root of Scutellaria baicalensis and its flavonoids on human gingival fibroblast[J]. Planta Med, 1995, 61(2): 150-153. [10] 李敬,刘云海,陈新,等.黄芩中黄芩苷的抗内毒素作用[J].医药导报,2006, 25(12):1237-1240. [11] Li J, Liu YH, Chen X, et al. Anti-endotoxin Effects of Baicalin Extracted from Radix Scutellariae[J]. Herald Med, 2006, 25 (12): 1237-1240. [12] 任慧霞,王厚全,张建国.黄芩苷的热原反应研究[J].食品与药品A,2006, 8(2):39-41. [13] Ren HX, Wang HQ, Zhang JG. Pyrogen reaction of baicalin[J]. Food Drug, 2006, 8(2): 39-41. [14] 尹楠,李红阳,彭国平,等.超滤法去除中药注射液中的细菌内毒素[J].中国医药工业杂志,2008, 39(12):927-929. [15] Yin N, Li HY, Peng GP, et al. Elimination of bacterial endotoxins in Chinese traditional medicine injection by ultrafiltration device[J]. Chin J Pharm, 2008, 39(12): 927-929.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 629
- HTML全文浏览量: 2
- PDF下载量: 606
- 被引次数: 0